So I’ve had enough coffee and the lighting is particularly interesting, I think we are ready to discuss the relevance or irrelevance of relevance or irrelevance. It can be a quite simple idea to figure out in the right mood but increasingly difficult under the wrong circumstances…
How relevant is irrelevance? I was thinking about this as I was walking around this morning… I reckon that they may both be one in the same. But I’m not sure how this works. It’s kind of like the argument in algebra that a = b and it goes on that you can derive 1 = 2.
As well, I just read about the newly found gospels according to Judas. You know he was the guy who sold Jesus for thirty pieces of silver and then committed suicide. Well it turns out that there is more to the story than that. After some retrospect, beer, and the like, that original story is totally weird. Why would a best friend sell his best friend and the leader of their team to the Romans for the equivalence of new shoes? Well, it turns out, because Jesus asked him to. It’s like I need my best friend to kill me so that my family can cash in on my insurance policy. It was the final step of making Jesus what he is today and it couldn’t have happened any other way. And that made him feel horrible. That he actually killed his best buddy. See how the relevant the irrelevant is? Maybe?
I was also thinking about the …see now I’ve had way too much coffee and the thought is lost, only to be continued by one of you readers.
….To Be Continued, I hope…
2 comments:
There is a constant to relevance and irrelevance. In order to understand the correlation between the two, one must first look at the following.
In all things, energy is a driving factor and can be put into a certain aspects of life as well. Effort that we put into something is a form of that energy. We can derive that relevance is a state of force or energy, and irrelevance is a state of resistance by thier very definitions.
OHMS law states that P=E^2/R Where p=power e=energy and r=resistance
Lets us state that P=is the measure of relevance vs irrelevance where relevance is E and irrelevance is R.
Let us also put our effort to a scale for this experiment and say that things we care about have an effort rating from 1-10 1 the least and 10 the most and those that we do not care about have a resistance rating of 1-10 again 1 least and 10 most.
So, if we care enough about something to put moderate effort into it, we have a E=5. So, we have P=5^2/R. Let us also say that we have a resistance from an outside factor that is equal to our effort. So now we have P=5^2/5. So in this example we have P=5. Now, lets say we have a greater irrelevance that we do relevance. P=1^2/10 so P=0.1.
So, as you can seein plain energy, no matter how much something is irrelevant, it will always bare some relevance somewhere, no matter how small.
Post a Comment